I think 4pyros solved the mystery of the controller. The simulation that you linked too seems to make it all click. Note that when they talk about the 2-pole motor, they say that OPPOSING coils are energized at the same time.
Not sure I buy that one. In any case it still wouldn't match the layout and why would you net 2 FET switches
I'm happy to try to amalgamate the various suggestions to date to improve the design of the tidal simulator system, but I'd like to make sure we're all singing from the same hymn sheet.
Here's a list of features as I see it. Feel free to add/subtract/modify..
1) Reliability is key, but so is cost, so compromise may be necessary..
...(d) Latches power off, until manually reset, if current exceeds ~1.5A for > ~ 1 sec,.
alec_t;1065492 6) [U said:Speed controller[/U]
...(a) A switched-mode buck converter with adjustable output (~ 10V?)
+1. And thanks ()blivion for sharing your thoughts.
That's an amazing circuit you wrote, Alec. Plus you keep an open mind.
Only the problem one.Would that shut down all four pumps or only the problem pump?
I'm in the process of trying to simulate the action of a resettable fuse such as the type Ronv linked to. Using that combined with a transistor-based shut-off I think we can get reasonable protection for both pump and controller.Sounds like a fuse type thing
I don't suppose the melt-down was funThis has been fun and I've learned a lot.
alec said:I don't suppose the melt-down was fun . I've certainly had fun on the design side and I think we've all learned a lot more about BLDC motors.
At last.... a draft of a beefed-up pump driver module ("PDM-Mk2" for ease of reference).
.
Sure. Almost any 3A Schottky diode.Can MBRS340 still be repaced with 1N5822?
Well I haven't drawn out an alarm module yet but, yes, that would do nicely. I see you get 2 for the money, but I was thinking all 4 DPMs could use a single buzzer.Would this work? Do I need four alarms?
Yes. I was assuming you'd salvage bits from your present build; or will you be starting from scratch? If you compare PDM-Mk2 with your present build you will notice many parts in common. Since there will be extra components I guess you'll need a different board layout, but instead, IMO, it would be preferable to build each PDM on its own little board. I like KISS's idea of going modular (though not necessarily with the full DIN kit he mentioned, unless you've got a rich Uncle!).Is this still a good choice for the MOSFET?
Any 2.7V zener diode.Can you give the critical specs (for this project) for the Zener diode BZX79C2V7
I'll draw up a revised timer module schematic for that. Initially I'd be inclined to try one PDM.how to hook up with IC4093.
R1 replaces R5/R6/D3 in my version of the dwg (though I'm not sure if my version has the same component numbering as the one I posted). All will be clear (famous last words) from the revised timer module.Does R1 (33K) in PDM-Mk2 replace R4 & R5 (10K) from post 367?
It only makes sense if the pumps are still under warranty. They'd be better fitted with heavier duty plugs and corresponding sockets for reliability. Just for testing you can probably get away with the present connectors. Just watch out for smoke signalsI'm thinking since the plug failed too, heavy duty jacks are of no benefit. Does that make sense?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?