Continue to Site

Welcome to our site!

Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

  • Welcome to our site! Electro Tech is an online community (with over 170,000 members) who enjoy talking about and building electronic circuits, projects and gadgets. To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Low-pass filter with C but no R

carbonzit

Well-Known Member
This is something that's bugged me for some time now.

I hasten to point out that IANAEE (I am not an electronics expert); I know enough to get into trouble, and maybe a little more. Hence my puzzlement on this point.

In another thread there's a discussion of why, when a guy added a series resistor to the input of an amplifier, it degraded the sound quality by what sounded like attenuating high frequencies, the classic effect of a low-pass filter. The theory advanced was that by adding the series resistor, it formed a low-pass filter with an already-existing capacitor at the input of the amp.

This does not make sense to me. Let me explain why.

This shows the classic low-pass filter with both a C and R, but also simply a C:

LPF.gif


We know the C-R network forms a low-pass filter. But doesn't a C by itself also form one? It's simply the degenerate case where R=0, right? It will still function to attenuate high frequencies. Look at power supplies that have filter capacitors but no series resistors (some have them, some don't). There's your R-less LPF.

Just to be clear, I am not suggesting that one doesn't ever need an R to make a LPF; it's certainly needed to create the proper response curve, rolloff and cutoff frequency. But if that amplifier already had a C across its input, I don't see how adding an R would suddenly create a LPF where none existed before. It would certainly change the response of the filter, but my guess is that it would have less effect, overall, than the C already has.

So what am I missing here? I'll let the experts here respond.
 
Solution
So when I show a LPF with just C and no R, that's exactly what I mean: whatever R there is in wires or other components should be completely swamped by the other components, since R is essentially zero, correct? So in other words, we can have a LPF that has (virtually) no R.

No, but if a circuit adds a capacitor like that to act as an LPF, then it's because it's relying on a suitable source impedance - in your case the circuit is meaningless, because it only shows part of the circuit.

It's quite simple, for such a crude LPF as this - simply calculate the impedance of the capacitor at the frequency you require, then the series resistor (or source impedance) needs to be that resistance.

For example, a 1000Hz LPF with a...
Are you implying "shorting" across the power rail with a capacitor? Current flows in and out of a capacitor, it is not a "short" by most people's definition.
Wellll, all I can tell you is that when people do AC analysis of circuits, they speak of capacitors as behaving like a short circuit to AC signals. From one of my electronics textbooks:
In [a figure in the book], the capacitor ideally looks like a short to an ac signal. Because of this, point A is shorted to ground as far as the ac signal is concerned. That is why we have labeled point A as ac ground.
 
AC analysis of the Z of a C :

1724284098138.png



So Xc is only a short at very high frequency/high C values. But real C's actually model like this
with their imperfections :

1724284341440.png


So due to ESL primarily XC may rise at high frequencies where the C becomes less like
a C and more like an L.


Regards, Dana.
 
Last edited:

Latest threads

New Articles From Microcontroller Tips

Back
Top