Thanks for the data sheet. So which type of battery do you have? There are three in the data.
KPM?KPL?KPH? Then there are numbers to indicate size like 100?
Thanks for the data sheet. So which type of battery do you have? There are three in the data.
KPM?KPL?KPH? Then there are numbers to indicate size like 100?
Is KPM32P - cell where MNF in 2009 but never used.
So need to get the cells up to the same performance !
According to sources these are diehard's - so I am hoping the will all come back to good potential. I don't think there is any damage for standing this long none of them are dead.
I'd reduce the current (PSU setting) somewhat, the cells should not be rising to that voltage if they are in good condition.
The metal in the plates may have crystallised from being unused for years, meaning the cell internal resistance may be rather higher than it should be.
Under normal working conditions the "active" metal is amorphous, which makes it more reactive with the electrolyte. If left unused, the metal gradually crystallises (the same way that galvanised steel develops crystal pattern in the zinc coating over time), which changes how the cells react.
The cure in normal NiCDs is to deep discharge each cell individually to a fraction of a volt, then recharge.
As long as the loads are connected directly to each cell rather than an overall battery, there is no possibility of voltage reversal and it does no harm, just allows the plates to slowly react at their own rates rather than being forced.
I'd reduce the current (PSU setting) somewhat, the cells should not be rising to that voltage if they are in good condition.
The metal in the plates may have crystallised from being unused for years, meaning the cell internal resistance may be rather higher than it should be.
Under normal working conditions the "active" metal is amorphous, which makes it more reactive with the electrolyte. If left unused, the metal gradually crystallises (the same way that galvanised steel develops crystal pattern in the zinc coating over time), which changes how the cells react.
The cure in normal NiCDs is to deep discharge each cell individually to a fraction of a volt, then recharge.
As long as the loads are connected directly to each cell rather than an overall battery, there is no possibility of voltage reversal and it does no harm, just allows the plates to slowly react at their own rates rather than being forced.
This show the cell volts from 1.7v per cell, which is the equalizing voltage per cell. I don't really understand this chart. As I see it you will never get these cells to full capacity? especially if they are charged at for example 1.45v ?
NiCd (and many other rechargeables) "leak" a small amount of current, especially when at or near full charge, so all cells in a battery pack chain get a steady trickle charge which automatically equalises them.
Lithium battery types are an exception, as they have near zero leakage so no self-equalisation.
It looks like those particular cells have a higher full charge voltage than the ones I found data on at the start of this thread, so the approx. 1.66V per cell is fine, and they have already balanced to +/-20mV of their average voltage.
NiCd (and many other rechargeables) "leak" a small amount of current, especially when at or near full charge, so all cells in a battery pack chain get a steady trickle charge which automatically equalises them.
Lithium battery types are an exception, as they have near zero leakage so no self-equalisation.
It looks like those particular cells have a higher full charge voltage than the ones I found data on at the start of this thread, so the approx. 1.66V per cell is fine, and they have already balanced to +/-20mV of their average voltage.