Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's something strange here. The original darlington from a pink module returns an HFe of 17, and Uf (voltage forward) around 1 volt. Anyone tried to measure the original ATOM darlington?Its a bit hard to see in the pictures, but the markings are the same on both transistors. But the one on the right is faulty, poor gain & will give intermitent spark or none at all.View attachment 119970View attachment 119971View attachment 119972
Exactly one of the strange things KISS! Going to mount the original darlington into my circuit to find out what makes the Pink work on a Solex. Might be my new tester that are crapA darlington gain can't be 17. The gains of the transistors multiply.
Long story short. If 403C422 (original darlington(?)) are mounted into the constallation IT WORKS! Must be some kind of special this semiconductor...whatever it contains.Exactly one of the strange things KISS! Going to mount the original darlington into my circuit to find out what makes the Pink work on a Solex. Might be my new tester that are crap
Long story short. If 403C422 (original darlington(?)) are mounted into the constallation IT WORKS! Must be some kind of special this semiconductor...whatever it contains.
Thank you Debe, it reasures me that i’m not going mad completely. Fancy tester the second one. First one is similar to the one i found on eBay for 12$. Tried some other darlingtons, but same result both in the tester and the circuit. The Solex flywheel have 4 magnets, which makes it somewhat special. Waiting for some other transistors. Didnt expect rocketscience with a circuit that contains only 5-6 components. Very strange i must say. Also tried the ‘birdnest’ config ie no PCB involved, but it didnt change the result.This is the tests on 2 different component testers of the original Atom transistor marked A1.View attachment 120642View attachment 120643View attachment 120644View attachment 120645View attachment 120646View attachment 120647View attachment 120648View attachment 120649View attachment 120650
Thank you Debe, it reasures me that i’m not going mad completely. Fancy tester the second one. First one is similar to the one i found on eBay for 12$. Tried some other darlingtons, but same result both in the tester and the circuit. The Solex flywheel have 4 magnets, which makes it somewhat special. Waiting for some other transistors. Didnt expect rocketscience with a circuit that contains only 5-6 components. Very strange i must say. Also tried the ‘birdnest’ config ie no PCB involved, but it didnt change the result.
My tester uses a 9volt battery, so maybe i should use a dc power supply. I’m still puzzled to why the original transistors show Uf above 1volt, and also what possible difference it would have in this config.datasheet is here: https://www.ges.cz/sheets/2/2sd1071.pdf
there are two B-E junctions in series. That would suggest a V(b-e) of around 1.2V.
V(b-e)(Sat) is 2V from the datasheet.
Saturation values are often different when the transitor is used as a switch or amplifier. Note the curves for the saturation voltages..
The graphs also show that you need Ic to be 50 mA to show an Hfe of 40.
At Ic = 2.5 mA, Hfe might well be 8 Usually Vbe is more indicative of bad in my experience with bi-polar transistors.
My tester uses a 9volt battery, so maybe i should use a dc power supply. I’m still puzzled to why the original transistors show Uf above 1volt, and also what possible difference it would have in this config.