Oznog
Active Member
Ah, those were sold under the name "GreenPlugs" and the more heavily marketed "PowerPlanner". Home Depot had a TV replaying the PowerPlanner infomercial over and over in an endless loop, it was most annoyingly burned into my mind by force and I have to hate them for this crap.
They not only do a form of power factor correction, but their advertising seemed to show some sort of scope wave indicated the peak voltage was being lowered. I don't know what's up with that peak voltage reduction, but I'm curious to find out more about that feature. I also saw somewhere that this was used if your power company was sending you an especially "hot" main (say 130v rms) then it would trim down the voltage and lower the excess current in the process. I doubt this is often a useful case.
I have seen the "flea market demonstration" personally. They show a motor with no run capacitor installed, and no load, will see the absolute (real+imaginary) current go way down. This is totally irrelevant because with no load no real current is being used, it's all reactive. The motor is not doing any useful work. Home Depot had a similar demonstration box set up.
I don't believe power companies can charge for reactive power (aka "imaginary" power). It is not energy and I don't think the meters read it. I kinda want to do some research to be sure. Anywasy, power factor correction eliminates the reactive component.
So here's the jist. Motors such as a fridge, AC, etc usually have a "run capacitor" in parallel with the motor to cancel out its reactive current anyways, an effective form of power factor correction. Some power tools do not, I think not only because the tool size is important but the required capacitance varies with load and the load is unpredictable. Plus it's probably just not important given the intermittent use.
I read somewhere that the type of circuit used by these was integrated into all finished appliances made after 1992. Simply put, it is implausible that anything simple which could save even 1% off your energy would not already be built into a significant device like an AC system.
At best, this will save you nothing unless it's on a pre-1992 appliance, at worst, the noise induced from mucking with the waveform might hurt the motor or electronics inside your appliance. This waveform goes to the electronics and its SCRs, etc and unexpected waveform features could toast some systems.
They not only do a form of power factor correction, but their advertising seemed to show some sort of scope wave indicated the peak voltage was being lowered. I don't know what's up with that peak voltage reduction, but I'm curious to find out more about that feature. I also saw somewhere that this was used if your power company was sending you an especially "hot" main (say 130v rms) then it would trim down the voltage and lower the excess current in the process. I doubt this is often a useful case.
I have seen the "flea market demonstration" personally. They show a motor with no run capacitor installed, and no load, will see the absolute (real+imaginary) current go way down. This is totally irrelevant because with no load no real current is being used, it's all reactive. The motor is not doing any useful work. Home Depot had a similar demonstration box set up.
I don't believe power companies can charge for reactive power (aka "imaginary" power). It is not energy and I don't think the meters read it. I kinda want to do some research to be sure. Anywasy, power factor correction eliminates the reactive component.
So here's the jist. Motors such as a fridge, AC, etc usually have a "run capacitor" in parallel with the motor to cancel out its reactive current anyways, an effective form of power factor correction. Some power tools do not, I think not only because the tool size is important but the required capacitance varies with load and the load is unpredictable. Plus it's probably just not important given the intermittent use.
I read somewhere that the type of circuit used by these was integrated into all finished appliances made after 1992. Simply put, it is implausible that anything simple which could save even 1% off your energy would not already be built into a significant device like an AC system.
At best, this will save you nothing unless it's on a pre-1992 appliance, at worst, the noise induced from mucking with the waveform might hurt the motor or electronics inside your appliance. This waveform goes to the electronics and its SCRs, etc and unexpected waveform features could toast some systems.