Voltage Spike
New Member
That is like what I am going for. Just going to use a toroid for the ferrite.
That is like what I am going for. Just going to use a toroid for the ferrite.Yes, thats how some computing actually works.
Thanks Chris. I already knew about and read the wiki article on the joule thief as I had seen that BigClive gave it that name, and it stuck. But I will read the other link about the blocking oscillator for extra credit.The Joule Thief is a variation of a blocking oscillator. Here are wiki's for each of those.
Joule Thief https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule_thief
Blocking oscillator https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_oscillator
Also, you can find more discussions about the subject that have been had here on this forum through the search function at the top of this page, as well as the Similar threads at the bottom of this page.
1. Best toroid type to use? Many different options out there when it comes to colors and specs.
2. High or low permeability?
3. Wire size smaller or larger with more or less wraps? What range in uH values are best for efficiency?
4. Single layer wraps only or can I wrap over existing wires when making my toroid?
Core losses increase with peak value of magnetic induction and by higher frequency. Different cores has diferent losses. Number of turns affects inductance and inductance affects resonance frequency. Losess in resistance can be calculated as R*i*i ...That is like what I am going for. Just going to use a toroid for the ferrite.Thare are numerous designs on the internet but I am just wanting mine to be more efficient. I will report back once I get testing but it won't be today.
Sorry i am not able to provide solution. And i dont even want to. he will not learn anything and i can not lead his every step remotely. But i can try to provide a direction.Successive approximation methods have there place in computing maxima and minima in complex differential equations, but this is electronics not computing.
The link you gave provides a parts list for a known working solution. You can obtain the pieces and put it together like lego or paint by numbers.
It doesn't answer the OP questions:
You gave a list of equations earlier in the thread; but you gave no definitions of what those equations were, or how they might be used to answer the questions. Nor even any indication that you know how to use them.
until I start making one or more to compare I won't find the answer to efficient core type, winding wire size and turns, and size of toroid. I want it small but efficient as for now it's all about LED and so called dead batteries and length of on time.
Buk,Try playing with this: https://tinyurl.com/yzb7b5f7
Try varying the base inductance; the base resistor value; and the turns ratio of the transformer and note the effect the changes have on the frequency & duty cycle of the LED. Then try reducing the voltage level until the led no longer lights.
You can learn far more, far more quickly about the effects the components have using a simulation, than you can building half a dozen actual circuits.
Then you can try relating your observations to the formulae MacIntoshCZ posted earlier.
if its used for coil, than yes it will be msot likely uH.Buk,
Thanks for the link to the simulation. That is really cool. I have heard of LTSpice but never used it yet but I think it is free. I also read a lot where LTSpice was not able to properly simulate some circuits but that could be from people that don't know how to use it, or how to make a proper circuit.I have been playing around with it and already find it very useful. I changed the base inductance, resistance, the LED type, the current, but didn't know I could change the turns ratio of the transformer. I will go back and look at that. Question: What does the "u" mean as in 100u in the simulator? Is that the same as uH?
Thanks
p.s. I know the online simulator is not LTSpice but I brought that up as another simulator that I could use if I could figure it out.
Did you create that circuit? I was looking in the menu and there are all kinds of circuit simulations including a joule thief (under the transistor section). But once I looked around at the other circuits I couldn't find (in the menu) the circuit you sent me in the first place. Was it one already in the menu??
YW.Thanks for the link to the simulation. That is really cool. I have heard of LTSpice but never used it yet but I think it is free. I also read a lot where LTSpice was not able to properly simulate some circuits but that could be from people that don't know how to use it, or how to make a proper circuit.I have been playing around with it and already find it very useful. I changed the base inductance, resistance, the LED type, the current,
If you select Draw->Passive components->Custom transformer; draw one, and then double click to edit it, there is a label "description" in the dialog that is a link to a help page that explains the nomenclature for defining any kind of transformer you might think of.but didn't know I could change the turns ratio of the transformer. I will go back and look at that.
Question: What does the "u" mean as in 100u in the simulator? Is that the same as uH?
p.s. I know the online simulator is not LTSpice but I brought that up as another simulator that I could use if I could figure it out.
Did you create that circuit? I was looking in the menu and there are all kinds of circuit simulations including a joule thief (under the transistor section). But once I looked around at the other circuits I couldn't find (in the menu) the circuit you sent me in the first place. Was it one already in the menu??
Thanks Buk for all the good info and that simulator. I was playing around with it quite a bit and will do some more tomorrow. Some of that math hurts my head though but I can generally get through it will looking at an online converter etc. When I was a kid I never liked math. Then when I got into computer programming I wished I would have liked it more when I was young. But I did like I always do and bought some math books and figured out whatever I needed at the time. Now electronics has even more interesting math.YW.
If you select Draw->Passive components->Custom transformer; draw one, and then double click to edit it, there is a label "description" in the dialog that is a link to a help page that explains the nomenclature for defining any kind of transformer you might think of.
The u 'suffix' is actually an SI units prefix, where the unit has been omitted.
'u' generally means e-6 or 'micro'. In the context of an inductor it means 100uH or 100e-6H or 1e-4H; for a capacitor: 100uF or 100e-6F or 1e-4F; a resistor 100uΩ ....
An m (milli) means X.Xe-3; n (nano) is X.Xe-9; p (pico) is X.Xe-12.
I'm quite certain that LTSpice is a much more accomplished simulator. If I ever get my Master's in Arcane UI design and work out how to use it, i'll confirm that.
Meanwhile Falstad serves as a way to explore simple circuits and also share them.
The circuit I linked is basically the same as the one MacIntoshCZ linked above -- minus the capacitor that the author notes "can be omitted", that actually has no effect --regardless of value -- on the circuit at all that I could find.
Perhaps it would in a more faithful LTSpice simulation.
I'm in much the same boat. I did the math in college but then barely used it during my career. I implemented a mass of code that did very complex math. Complex in both senses of the word -- I even implemented a couple of limited complex math libraries in assembler and C -- but for the most part, the equations I was implementing were either devised by others or taken from reference books, so I rarely had occasion to consider how they did what they did. Just implement, verify with some test input and move on.Some of that math hurts my head though but I can generally get through it will looking at an online converter etc. When I was a kid I never liked math. Then when I got into computer programming I wished I would have liked it more when I was young. But I did like I always do and bought some math books and figured out whatever I needed at the time. Now electronics has even more interesting math.
tell me about it... I would need several hands and minds to complete everything i am interested in.but things are beginning to gel slowly.
But this non-critical circuit can be optimised to waste less mW.Ys.People often have a lot of worry about the core and make it harder than it really is for this non-critical circuit.
I never went to college so you got me there. My dad had nine kids and I was one of them. Two oldest girls got the chance to go to college went into nursing. Ran out of money for the rest of us.I'm in much the same boat. I did the math in college but then barely used it during my career. I implemented a mass of code that did very complex math. Complex in both senses of the word -- I even implemented a couple of limited complex math libraries in assembler and C -- but for the most part, the equations I was implementing were either devised by others or taken from reference books, so I rarely had occasion to consider how they did what they did. Just implement, verify with some test input and move on.
The same with electronics. What little formal education I had on the subject was assimilated enough to allow me to pass the courses and then mostly never re-visited. Lately I've had a bee in my bonnet about an idea or two that require electronics that cannot be bought off the shelf, so when I discovered Falstad a few years ago, it became my go to place for trying out circuits I found on line and exploring themm until I understood them enough to modify them for my needs.
I'm currently playing with an idea that requires the use of a switched voltage upscalar and RC resonant circuits. Hence my interest in this thread. I'm far from an expert -- just barely ahead of you I think -- but things are beginning to gel slowly.
Hi Dick. I have a boat load of links and schematics etc but I appreciate your input as the more the better. My main concern is length of run time for my experiment. I also wanted that to by with full on and not blinking but I see your example are all full on, just not efficient. I have always been confused with inductors as I never used them but it finally sunk in how valuable they really are. Now I just have all the noob questions on toroid type, size, turns and wire size, permeability, and resistance. And I see its gonna take some hard work until it all makes sense as there are so many joule thief designs and they are all different mainly with the toroid used and thereby the efficiency obtained. Do you know any good tips on toroid making?People often have a lot of worry about the core and make it harder than it really is for this non-critical circuit.
A nail does not make the best core for a switching power supply -that is why the 2700 pf cap is needed, but see how easy it can be?
View attachment 134261
This person wound his tapped inductor on a piece of wood!
View attachment 134262
This fellow wound his tapped coil around the lamp enclosure.
View attachment 134263
The above lights used a circuit that is electrically equivalent to the Joule Thief but does not use separate windings for base and collector circuits.
View attachment 134264
That one is very efficient. Too bad its a blinker. But nonetheless it is a keeper!But this non-critical circuit can be optimised to waste less mW.Ys.
And the same process of optimising the windings and core for this purpose, can then be applied to more critical circuits.
I think my wife might hold a similar opinion rearding me. E-bikes, leather craft, 3D printing, knife making, carving, wood turning re-building my 30 year old car; not to mention programming, metalwork...Somebody once told me that my "hobby" was "collecting hobbies".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?