Now I see the problem. Your switch is a simple ON/OFF toggle (like a light switch in your house). NOT the momentary push button type that I assumed.
This is how your original monostable 555 timer's graph should look using a momentary push button to initiate the 29 second output:
Note the "Trigger" pulse is short (2 seconds). It could be much shorter (milliseconds) and the output timing would remain the same.
It could also be much longer:
And the output is still 29 seconds.
But if the trigger exceeds the 29 second delay dictated by the caps/resistor circuit (47uF + 470uF + 51k resistor), then this happens to the output duration:
In other words, if the trigger pulse duration is greater than the timer's delay circuit duration, the output duration will equal the trigger duration.
So, with your original circuit, when you press the switch you're using to START the timer, if you turn the switch OFF before the end off the timer before the timer's delay duration, the output will stay ON for the normal time.
BUT, if you leave it ON for longer than 29 seconds (in your case, 26 seconds), the output will stay ON until you turn the switch OFF.
So, for your circuit to operate as it should, your switch must be toggled ON and then OFF in less that 26 seconds.
You might also note that while the output is ON, toggling your switch ON and OFF will have no effect for the duration of the normal timing of the output.
Thus, for you to get the timer results you've stated (from your post #10):
This change to the new circuit will give you, when you turn the switch ON, a fixed trigger duration, a consistent output duration and the option to stop the output pulse at any time by simply turning the timer OFF.
<EDIT> Grammatical error fixed (while changed to will).
This is how your original monostable 555 timer's graph should look using a momentary push button to initiate the 29 second output:
Note the "Trigger" pulse is short (2 seconds). It could be much shorter (milliseconds) and the output timing would remain the same.
It could also be much longer:
And the output is still 29 seconds.
But if the trigger exceeds the 29 second delay dictated by the caps/resistor circuit (47uF + 470uF + 51k resistor), then this happens to the output duration:
In other words, if the trigger pulse duration is greater than the timer's delay circuit duration, the output duration will equal the trigger duration.
So, with your original circuit, when you press the switch you're using to START the timer, if you turn the switch OFF before the end off the timer before the timer's delay duration, the output will stay ON for the normal time.
BUT, if you leave it ON for longer than 29 seconds (in your case, 26 seconds), the output will stay ON until you turn the switch OFF.
So, for your circuit to operate as it should, your switch must be toggled ON and then OFF in less that 26 seconds.
You might also note that while the output is ON, toggling your switch ON and OFF will have no effect for the duration of the normal timing of the output.
Thus, for you to get the timer results you've stated (from your post #10):
The new circuit will achieve that end with this change to the switch (that you are currently using) wiring arrangement:... So, best would be having the same switch to start and stop the motor whenever the user wants and also if the user forgets to off the switch it will have a timeout after 26secs which saves electricity and power. ...
This change to the new circuit will give you, when you turn the switch ON, a fixed trigger duration, a consistent output duration and the option to stop the output pulse at any time by simply turning the timer OFF.
<EDIT> Grammatical error fixed (while changed to will).
Last edited: