bountyhunter
Well-Known Member
I showed up to reply to a post in this thread that was sent to my email (which contained the wrong answer) but obviously it has been deleted from the thread because it's not here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Firstly the values of resistance are given in full units. The final result is 0.54 ohms.
You cannot specify the result to an accuray of hundredths when the inital values are not stated to that accuracy.
A value of 0.54 is rounded to 0.5 That's how the final "technical" result was obtained.
I did NOT specify the accuracy to hundredths, I specified it as a fraction: 5/11 is a fraction which is the EXACT answer to the question and you can carry the fraction out to any decimal you want or leave it as is. There is no reason an answer to a problem must be given in decimal form. In this case, it would imply to an old instructor like myself that I was reading a paper from a "calculator cripple" which is somebody who didn't know basic math skills because they always rely on a calculator. Giving the answer as 5/11 shows the person actually understands the techniques required to solve the problem and does not assume accuracy beyond the stated problem parameters.Firstly the values of resistance are given in full units. The final result is 0.54 ohms.
You cannot specify the result to an accuray of hundredths when the inital values are not stated to that accuracy.
A value of 0.54 is rounded to 0.5 That's how the final "technical" result was obtained.
Here's my opinion:
I think you should as a general rule give the answer to one more significant figure than the numbers given to you.
If in doubt display the answer to three significant figures then round it.
Here's how I'd solve the problem:
[latex]
R = \frac{1}{ \frac{1}{R1}+\frac{1}{R2}+\frac{1}{R3}} = \frac{1}{ \frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}}= 0.545\Omega \\
V = IR = 2 \times 0.545 \times 2= 1.09V[/latex]
Rounded to 2 significant figures: 1.1V
I agree but some schools and colleges don't see it that way, from their perspective you can't give figures beyond the number of decimal places given in the question. I know that's complete rubbish but I don't make the rules.Since the initial values are whole integers, you can carry them through the entire calculation as fractions and give the exact answer. When you round things off, you make assumptions and throw away information. It is ALWAYS best to display the exact answer (if there is one) and let the next user decide where to round it off. Once you round it off, all info past the last digit is lost.
You mead 0.55colin54 said:A value of 0.54 is rounded to 0.5
But, I didn't do that. Like I said: no law says it has to be converted to decimal. I did it in fractions keeping all values in whole integer expressions or ratios.I agree but some schools and colleges don't see it that way, from their perspective you can't give figures beyond the number of decimal places given in the question. I know that's complete rubbish but I don't make the rules.