Who do you think controls the politicians over there? Congressmen are just puppets on a string in the US.
most heavy plant uses a diesel engine for it's motive power, those that use hydraulic motive power only do 2-3 mph.
Electric motors are very efficient compared to other alternatives. Large ships, cruise ships and cargo ships, use diesel motors to make electricity and the ships propeller motors are electric.
This has three benefits:
1) The ship needs electricity anyway
2) The diesel motors can be run at their maximum efficiency point. Extra energy (electricity) is stored and used when necessary.
3) Electric power is very easy to distribute around compared to mechanical (and hydraulic) power.
Well I'm no expert on the matter. I was just making the suggestion. It's pretty amazing what fluid pressure can do.For moving heavy things slowly, and with no regard to efficiency, it's excellent - and has it's place.
However, it would be absolutely useless for a car - have you ever driven an hydraulically powered vehicle? - aircraft aren't powered in that way, and most heavy plant uses a diesel engine for it's motive power, those that use hydraulic motive power only do 2-3 mph.
You are probably correct. I didn't know about the Navy changing the catapult to electric, thanks for the info. Also not using steam will cut down on corrosion issues.My John Deere tractor runs completely on hydrostatic drive for both moving the tractor and operating the front loader. Of course, the power comes from a diesel engine, but the transmission is hydraulic based and works very well. Only the power take off for implements is powered directly from the engine.
I don't think it is far fetched to imagine a car operated in this way, but I have to think that electric motors are a better choice in terms of efficiency and controllability for automobiles.
It's interesting that the Navy is replacing their steam catapults with an all electric system based on motors and generators. The benefits are greater power and better controllability which translates to heavy aircraft that can be launched and longer lifetime and better reliability for the aircraft due to lower launch stresses. LOL, a tech I threw that one in there for you. hahaha
I was talking to a guy yesterday who had to get rid of his electric car... Actually it was a hybrid.. Apparently the maintenance was far more costly than conventional cars... He was fine with the performance and how quiet it runs, but the power invertor units ( can't remember his exact words) were very costly and packed up regularly..
But obviously, you're adding a great deal more complexity to a car making it a hybrid, so maintenance costs are likely to be higher.
Every time I start reading up on a some new EV or hybrid vehicle coming out I see the specs and design layout for the drive systems and I can't help but think WTF are they doing? Industrial electric and hybrid drive does not use this overly complicated approach and are thusly well known and proven for being extremely reliable even when used in conditions that a typical persons daily commuter/grocery getter vehicle would consider extreme environments and abuse.
Completely different solutions to completely different problems - industrial solutions would be useless for a car.
How do you figure that?
The industrial hybrid engine over electric drivetrain tech is well designed and proven technology that's been around for decades now. It's well proven to be rugged, highly efficient, and cost effective.
Small, light, fast, efficient - things that don't really apply in industrial versions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?